And we are supposed to think/feel, cry/laugh, be sad/happy, and a million other dualities in Life's expression. I have taken JamesThomas', Poppers', and Nvrgnbk's very eloquent explanations to heart and do think the answer may be to allow the experience but not be defined by it.
I think this comment really takes us back full circle to our JW days. We learned from them that we "should" always be happy because we are in a "spiritual paradise". We learned that we "should not" grieve as others do when our loved ones die. We "should not" get too carried away with passion and sexual pleasure. We learned not to ask questions, not to seek, not to inquire, only to recite mind numbingly boring childish rehetoric. We learned to walk around with false perkiness and friendliness to keep up the image. We learned to numb our grief and sadness with alcohol and antidepressants. We defined ourselves by that religion to the point where we couldn't feel the full gamut of human emotions and experience true spirituality. We actually learned that there was something "wrong" with us the way we are. That we were "fallen". What if we are not "fallen"? What if we are "perfect" just the way we are, experiencing all the highs and lows of being human? What if there is no "higher" plane to attain to? Can we be at peace with that? Can we be at peace with ourselves and each other, just the way we are, right now?
Thanks for starting this thread, Journey - On. We may not have solved the greater purpose of life, but I think that we have shown by example that is possible for atheists and believers, or any people of differing opinions to discuss openly and candidly without insult or disrespect. IMO, love and respect solve 99.9% of the world's problems.
Cog